SB | January 2026
In NCIP V. Macroasia (G.R. No. 226176, Aug. 9, 2023), the Supreme Court approved a Compromise Agreement after renewed Free and Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) consultations in Palawan led Indigenous communities to affirm support for mining.
This ruling underscores that Free and Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) is not a hollow ritual but a continuing obligation under the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act — one that carries immense weight in the struggle between ancestral land rights and extractive industry interests.
For advocates, the relevance of the ruling lies in three lessons: communities must remain vigilant in asserting their voices, legal victories can be fragile when overtaken by compromise, and alternative lawyering must be rooted in the lived experiences of Indigenous Peoples. Ultimately, while the Court affirmed that FPIC must be sought, the decision demonstrates how easily its meaning can be shaped by legal procedure and corporate negotiation. The struggle for genuine self-determination, therefore, continues beyond the courtroom, demanding solidarity, vigilance, and collective assertion of rights.
ALG files 17th petition vs the Anti-Terror Law
We are the Alternative Law Groups (ALG), a coalition of 18 legal resource NGOs that engages in...
Workers’ protection in the time of pandemic
2020 will be remembered as the year when the whole world stood still. For the first time since the...
What is the IP Education Program
With the mechanics of schools opening during this time of pandemic high on everyone's mind, let us...
THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND THE URBAN POOR: A CALL TO ACTION
An Open Letter to the Inter-Agency Task Force (IATF) for the Management of Emerging Infectious...
GOSH Gender-based Online Sexual Harassment
Online conduct targeted at a particular person that causes or is likely to cause another mental,...
Barangays during a state of calamity
Paalala sa tungkulin ng ating mga barangay sa panahon na kalamidad.

